![]() ![]() I'm certain Citrix will do the inevitable and that is to offer an ICA/HDX plug-in for RDSH outside of XenApp at a reduced price. What that did was force Citrix to go to market with yet another offering. Teradici also did something I think is flat-out awesome: Lowered the price of adopting RDSH technology with and without View. Whether it's true or not, Teradici just threw a wrench in there and made it very "cloudy." While XenApp customers will be able to see through the marketing, new and potential customers will, well… it's now an even fight with the "good enough" factor in full force. Teradici's marketing can now refute the Citrix advantage of XenApp. But here is the best part: Teradici just dragged Citrix to come play on its turf. ![]() If we were to compare them from a feature set, capabilities, and maturity perspective, Citrix still is the best choice. Citrix XenApp has the ICA/HDX protocol, and it also has an entire software stack that extends the feature capabilities of native RDSH. ![]() PCoIP for RDSH is very simply just another protocol that connects to RDSH, nothing more. When I first read the news I was pleasantly surprised but immediately had a hundred questions that went like this: "Well, how would that work?" I'll summarize here somewhat in this blog, but stay tuned because at VMworld I intend on having a deeper conversation with Teradici and will most certainly be reporting back. Teradici intends on shipping its PCoIP technology for Windows Remote Desktop Session Host this December. Teradici PCoIP Supports Windows Remote Desktop Session Host ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |